/ BLOG – 

Time Bars in Marine Insurance – Claiming against the Clock

When working in the realm of marine insurance, prompt claims handling is a must. You want to ensure your clients feel supported when they need you most. In other words, when an event disrupts the flow of their business.

In such circumstances, your customer satisfaction hangs by a thread. It’s all down to how swiftly you can achieve a favourable settlement for their claim.

Moreover, there’s another aspect that creates a sense of urgency in the claims handling process: time bars. This concept is crucial, as it limits the timeframe within which claims can be filed.

In this blog post, we’ll delve into the notion of time bars and the impact it may have on your clients’ claims.


Understanding time bars

Time bars, also known as time limitations or statutes of limitation, set a specified timeframe during which parties can bring a claim. In other words, they define the period during which a claim must be filed after an event happens that may lead to a potential loss.

Whether it be an accident, damage, or incident affecting vessels, cargo, or maritime activities, the clock starts ticking from the moment the event occurs. Or from when it becomes known or discoverable to the insured party.

Once this period lapses, the parties are barred from starting a lawsuit or filing for arbitration.


Why do time bars play a key role in marine insurance?

Time bars aim to ensure timely reporting. One could say they seek to strike a balance between the interests of insurers and policyholders. You need timely information to assess and manage risks. Meanwhile, insured parties need reasonable time to assess the situation, report losses, and comply with contractual obligations.

Now, many legal systems rely on the principle of “reasonable diligence” to define time bars. This implies the insured parties are to act reasonably in reporting losses, as soon as they become aware of them.


While the specific timeframes may vary across jurisdictions, the principle remains consistent. And so do the reasons behind it:

  • Preserving evidence to assess the cause and extent of the loss.
  • Expediting the resolution process, ensuring all parties involved can move forward efficiently.
  • Managing your risk exposure, as delayed claims could lead to inflated losses or fraudulent claims.
  • Avoiding prejudice to your policyholders, also in the form of higher premiums.

How do time bars impact claim validity?

Failure to abide by time bars may result in claims being rejected on the basis of untimeliness.

Yet, with claims sometimes arising years after the damage or loss happened, time bars can be a source of controversy.

As you know by now, failing to take note of these time limits invalidates claims. But there’s a crucial point not to be disregarded: time bars are not as clear-cut as one may desire.

You’ll have to keep in mind the time bars contained in each contract, and how they interact with the ones derived from various conventions. Moreover, maritime claims often have shorter statutory time limits than other claims in, say, contract or common law.

And, to make matters worse, time bars may vary across jurisdictions. 

How do different jurisdictions approach time bars?

Each jurisdiction is a mosaic of different legal systems, maritime traditions, and local industry practices. As a result, the specific timeframes, requirements for notice, and principles of reasonable diligence may vary.

For clarity’s sake, let’s compare two examples:

  • United States

In the US, there’s not a one-line statute of limitations for maritime claims.

Maritime law is federal and, as such, uniform throughout the states. Having said that, the US Congress hasn’t enacted a statute of limitations for maritime claims. This means claims arising under the general maritime law are usually not governed by specific time bar provisions.

Instead, courts apply the equitable doctrine of laches to determine the timeliness of maritime claims.


Laches consists of two factors that go hand in hand:

  1. Unreasonable delay by the claimant – The insured party delays in notifying you about a loss or making a claim.
  1. Prejudice to the defendant – The delay impacts your ability to assess the claim or take appropriate action.

Now, to determine what’s “unreasonable delay” in a certain situation, courts and arbitrators often look to comparable state or foreign statutes of limitation for guidance.

Factors such as the extent of the damage, the insured’s knowledge and the industry practices are taken into account when assessing whether a claim was timely.

  • China

Civil law systems like China have a different approach to time bans than common law jurisdictions.

The focus is on setting clear timeframes within which claims must be brought. The Chinese Maritime Code (CMC) and other relevant legislation provide specific statutes of limitation for different types of maritime claims. These statutory time bars are the primary mechanism for determining the validity of claims.

That said, unreasonable delay and resulting prejudice remain relevant concepts in China. Delays in starting legal actions may impact the claimant’s ability to rely on evidence. Which might affect the claim’s overall credibility.


As an insurance company with operations spanning borders, maintaining a comprehensive grasp of every jurisdiction’s time bars can be challenging. The expertise required to interpret and stay up-to-date with the evolving legal frameworks is a discipline in its own right.

And that’s where professional legal advisors come into the scene. Why not rely on skilled maritime lawyers to help you ensure your claims beat the clock?

Find out more about your legal protection services here.

We are Claimar, your Third Party Administration (TPA) management partner, skilled and expert in marine services.


Sign up to our newsletter